-
Partner
,
-
Inland Empire
,
- T: +1 951.788.0100
- D: +1 951.801.6612
- F: +1 951.788.5785
- tjex@bwslaw.com
- vCard
- Linked
Pronouns: he, him, his
Thomas Jex is a partner with the firm and serves as the City Attorney for the City of Wildomar, Town Attorney for the Town of Yucca Valley, and provides special counsel services for the Jurupa Unified School District.
Tom serves as a trusted advisor to public agency governing bodies, commissions, and staff on a wide array of municipal legal issues, including the Brown Act, Public Records Act, conflict of interest laws, planning and zoning laws, contracts, and constitutional issues, among others. He delivers advice to clients in a manner that is understandable and contains practical guidance that can be readily applied in the real world. Tom provides advice on both legal compliance and risk assessment, understanding that many situations faced by public agencies do not have clear cut answers.
Tom regularly advises elected and appointed officials, navigating delicate issues with politically-divergent boards. He clearly presents the impacts of legal constraints on agency activities. Tom takes time to understand the agency’s long- and short-term goals and how the law affects those objectives, finding ways to achieve them whenever possible. He focuses on crafting legal advice that is practical and workable.
Tom augments his practice by serving as a member of the Brown Act Committee of the League of California Cities – City Attorney’s Department. He has served as an adjunct professor for the University of California Riverside Extension where he taught courses on the Public Records Act and Redevelopment Law.
Tom lived for two years in Quito, Ecuador and is proficient in Spanish.
- J.D., cum laude, Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School, 1999
- B.A., English, California State University, San Bernardino, 1996
- State Bar of California
- United States District Court for the Central District of California
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- League of California Cities, City Attorney’s Department Nominating Committee, 2014
- League of California Cities, City Attorney's Department Brown Act Committee, 2010-2012 and 2021 to present
- League of California Cities, Environmental Quality Policy Committee, League Partner Liaison
- Join Us at the CalCities Annual Conference and Expo this October!
- General Conflict of Interest Laws Under the Political Reform Act
- Understanding California’s Ethics Training Requirements for Local Officials (Known As AB 1234)
- Public Law Update – AB 1307: Noise By Residential Occupants On Other People Is Not A Significant Effect For Purposes Of CEQA
- Public Law Update – Attorney General Opines that ADA-Disabled Members of Legislative Bodies May Attend Meetings Remotely
- Public Law Update – Trial Court holds that Senate Bill 9 Does Not Apply to Charter Cities
- Public Law Update – Department of Justice Publishes Regulation Requiring Local Agencies to Make Websites and Mobile Apps Accessible To Persons With Disabilities
- Public Law Update – Nollan/Dollan Takings Claim May Be Filed to Challenge Development Impact Fees Imposed Pursuant to Legislation, Supreme Court Rules
- Public Law Update – US Supreme Court Rules on Whether Actions Taken by Public Officials on Social Media Violates First Amendment
- Public Law Update – Court of Appeal Holds City Must Follow Building Code Provisions Regarding Administrative Hearings for Appeals of Building Code Violations
- Public Law Update – AB 1633: Addressing CEQA’s Use To Indefinitely Block Infill Housing
- 2023 Accessory Dwelling Unit Laws
- SB 4: Housing on Religious or College Property
- AB 965: Broadband Permit Efficiency and Local Government Staff Solution Best Practices Act of 2023
- SB 684 – New Streamlined Approval Process for Residential Projects on Small Urban Lots
- AB 1637 – Local Government: Internet Websites and Email Addresses
- AB 1638: Providing Emergency Information in Non-English
- AB 557: Updates to Teleconference Attendance by Legislative Bodies
- New FPPC Regulations for Campaign Contributions
- Are You Picture Perfect? AB 994 and Posting Mugshots on Law Enforcement Social Media Accounts
- Court Rules Commercial Cannabis Businesses are Similar to Current Land Uses and Covered by City’s General Plan EIR
- SB 329: Increase in Salary Cap for Council Members
- Changes to Medical Cannabis Regulations as a Result of the Medicinal Cannabis Patients’ Right of Access Act
- Distribution of Documents to Legislative Bodies Prior to Meetings
- Changes to General Plan Reporting Due to AB 1743 and AB 2094
- New Brown Act Provisions Allow Additional Process for Remote Meeting Attendance
- SB 1100 – Additional Process for Removal of Disruptive Individuals From Agency Meetings
- Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Elevates Six Members to Equity Partners and Appoints a New GC
- Court Holds Requesting 47,000 Pages Not Unduly Burdensome Under Public Records Act
- Court of Appeal Strictly Construes Brown Act Requirement to Make Documents Available for Public Inspection at the Time of Distribution to the Legislative Body
- Traversing Virtual Meetings
- Essential Hour: Your First Public Meeting – Brown Act Basics
- Records Retention Training
- Brown Act Essentials
- Advanced Brown Act Training
- Open and Public – Brown Act Workshop
- How to Build and Maintain the Public’s Trust: Practical Ethics and the Law (AB 1234)
- What You See Depends on Where You Sit
- Great! We’ve Been Served! Now What? How Do You As An Agency/Consultant Survive A CEQA Lawsuit
- Transparency Strategies
- Overview of Special District Laws
- Brown Act Essentials
- Understanding the Brown Act
- What You Need to Know About Public Records and Open Meetings
- Court of Appeal Rejects City’s Reliance on Setback Standard Under Housing Accountability Act
- AB 361 Extends Local Agency Meeting Teleconferencing Options Past September 30th
- Public Records Act’s Catchall Exemption Applies to COVID-19 Outbreak Location Information
- Protected: Increased Limits on Campaign Contributions and Gifts to CA Officials, Candidates
- Appeals Court Rules Governor Newsom’s Use of Emergency Powers Was Constitutional
- A Refresher on General Conflict-of-Interest Rules
- Bill Summaries: Animal Protections
- SB 288 – CEQA Exemption for Alternative Transportation Projects
- Changes to Public Generally Exception and New Requirement for Posting of Campaign Disclosure Documents Filed in Paper Format
- Bill Summaries | AB 2231 and AB 2311
- Housing Roundup: New Housing Bills Signed by Governor Newsom
- Recent Legislation Affecting Scooters, Skateboards and Parking Penalties
- AB 992 | The Brown Act & Social Media
- COVID-19 Updates for Employers
- Protecting Our Water and Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus
- Santa Monica’s At-large Method of Elections Does Not Violate the California Voting Rights Act
- Local Public Agencies Must Ensure Emails and Other Documents Are Retained Throughout CEQA Process and Override Automated Deletion Policies
- Local Special Taxes Proposed by Voter Initiative Subject to Majority Voter Approval
- FPPC Disclosure Revisions to Close Conflict of Interest Loophole
- National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward: No Cost for Redaction of Bodycam Footage in Response to CPRA Request
- National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward: No Cost for Redaction of Bodycam Footage in Response to CPRA Request
- Navigating the Brown Act During a Period of Local Emergency Due to COVID-19
- Zoning Ordinance Did Not Violate the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)
- Are you Compatible? Second Appellate District Considers Incompatible Offices and Finds Offices of Mayor and Board Director are Incompatible
- Brown Act: The Importance of Sticking to Your Agenda
- Brown Act: Avoiding Violations by Responding to Cease and Desist Letters
- Using The “Committee Exception” To Exclude Public Comment At Special Meeting Violates Brown Act
- Access to Private Entity Records is Not Enough to Compel Disclosure Obligations Under CPRA
- Volunteer Lawyer of the Year – Inland Empire Latino Lawyers Association, 2005